SPOT BTC ETF AUM · BTC:$81,732.46 SPOT ETH ETFs · ETH:$2,367.00 IRC § 408 RETIREMENT TRUSTS:6 Audited CC EAL6+ VAULTS · MEMPOOL:4 sat/vB (2-of-3: $0.67) EXPLOIT LEDGER:$21.19B (1,328) DFPI/SEC SCAM RADAR:1,398 Flagged
SEC Institutional Comparison MARA (CIK 0001507605) vs RIOT (CIK 0001167419)

MARA vs. RIOT (2026): Corporate Crypto Model, Balance Sheet BTC & Tax Audit

Head-to-head institutional equity comparison between MARA Holdings, Inc. (formerly Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) (MARA) and Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT). Compare primary crypto business models (Bitcoin Mining & Digital Energy Infrastructure vs. Bitcoin Mining & Vertically Integrated Data Center Infrastructure), balance-sheet Bitcoin holdings, options liquidity, and IRC § 1091 C-Corporation tax rules.

Analytical Verdict: MARA vs. RIOT

Corporate Sector & Fee Structure: Both MARA and RIOT are SEC-reporting C-Corporation stocks with 0.00% ETF management fee (no Grantor Trust TER drag).
Operating Exposure: MARA focuses on Bitcoin Mining & Digital Energy Infrastructure (N/A (Corporate Equity — holds mined & purchased BTC on corporate balance sheet)), whereas RIOT focuses on Bitcoin Mining & Vertically Integrated Data Center Infrastructure (N/A (Corporate Equity)).

Side-by-Side SEC & Custodial Specification Matrix: MARA vs. RIOT

Specification MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc.) RIOT (Riot Platforms, Inc.)
Full Legal NameMARA Holdings, Inc. (formerly Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.)Riot Platforms, Inc.
Exchange & TickerNASDAQ: MARANASDAQ: RIOT
SEC Central Index Key (CIK)00015076050001167419
Primary Sector / Vehicle TypeBitcoin Mining & Digital Energy InfrastructureBitcoin Mining & Vertically Integrated Data Center Infrastructure
Annual Management Fee (TER)0.00% (Direct Corporate Equity) (No ETF Fee (C-Corp Stock))0.00% (Direct Corporate Equity) (No ETF Fee (C-Corp Stock))
Custody / Balance Sheet RoleN/A (Corporate Equity — holds mined & purchased BTC on corporate balance sheet)N/A (Corporate Equity)
Benchmark / Index MembershipS&P SmallCap 600 / Russell 2000Russell 2000
Options AvailabilityNASDAQ / Cboe OptionsNASDAQ / Cboe Options
Tax Reporting StructureC-Corporation Common Stock — Issues Form 1099-B on saleC-Corporation Common Stock — Issues Form 1099-B on sale
IRC § 1091 Wash Sale RuleSubject to IRC § 1091 Wash Sale Rule (Corporate Equity Security)Subject to IRC § 1091 Wash Sale Rule (Corporate Equity Security)
FIDUCIARY MEMORANDUM & SEC EDGAR LEDGER // AUDITED 2026-10-30

Executive Summary & Verified SEC Equity Fact Sheet: MARA vs. RIOT (2026-10-30)

01MARA SEC CIK & Exchange
NASDAQ: MARA (CIK 0001507605)
02RIOT SEC CIK & Exchange
NASDAQ: RIOT (CIK 0001167419)
03Primary Business Sector
MARA: Bitcoin Mining & Digital Energy Infrastructure | RIOT: Bitcoin Mining & Vertically Integrated Data Center Infrastructure
04Corporate BTC Treasury Holdings
MARA: N/A (Corporate Equity — holds mined & purchased BTC on corporate balance sheet) | RIOT: N/A (Corporate Equity)
05Annual Management Fee (TER)
0.00% (Direct Corporate Equity — No ETF Sponsor Fee)
06Key Operating Driver & Risk
MARA: Energized Hashrate + Mined BTC Hold (1.95x BTC Beta) vs. RIOT: Texas Power Credits + Mining Capacity (1.88x BTC Beta)
07IRS Tax Classification
Form 1099-B (C-Corp Equity Capital Gains · Subject to IRC § 1091 Wash Sale)
MARA vs RIOT (2026): Crypto Stock, BTC Treasury & Tax Audit
ARCHIVAL DOSSIER PLATE // 1200×675 WEBPMARA vs RIOT (2026) — 1200×675 Archival Dossier Plate[↗ INSPECT ARCHIVAL PLATE]

How Do Corporate Business Models, Balance Sheet BTC Holdings & Equity Dilution Risk Compare Between MARA and RIOT?

Unlike 1933 Act Grantor Trust Spot ETFs (which passively hold a fixed pool of Bitcoin or Ether and deduct an annual sponsor expense ratio), MARA Holdings, Inc. (formerly Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) (MARA) and Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) are operating C-Corporation equities registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Neither MARA nor RIOT charges an ETF management fee (0.00% TER on a $1,000, $10,000, or $100,000 stock position). Instead, shareholder returns are governed by corporate cash flows, balance-sheet Bitcoin treasury accumulation, operating leverage, and capital-structure dilution (convertible senior notes, at-the-market equity offerings, and employee stock-based compensation).

Specifically, MARA operates in Bitcoin Mining & Digital Energy Infrastructure (Largest publicly traded US Bitcoin mining company by energized hash rate and second-largest corporate Bitcoin treasury holder after Strategy (MSTR).), exhibiting a historical realized beta of approximately 1.95x relative to spot Bitcoin. Conversely, RIOT operates in Bitcoin Mining & Vertically Integrated Data Center Infrastructure (Operates large-scale Bitcoin mining and HPC data center facilities in Rockdale and Corsicana, Texas, plus Kentucky operations (acquired via Block Mining).), carrying a realized beta near 1.88x. On a $10,000 or $100,000 institutional allocation, choosing between MARA and RIOT is a structural decision between Energized Hashrate + Mined BTC Hold and Texas Power Credits + Mining Capacity—and both should be benchmarked against 1:1 unlevered Spot ETFs (IBIT at 0.25% TER or BTC Mini at 0.15% TER) and $0/yr air-gapped hardware self-custody.

How Do Balance Sheet Custody, Counterparty Risk & SEC Form 10-K Oversight Differ?

Both MARA (SEC CIK 0001507605, traded on NASDAQ) and RIOT (SEC CIK 0001167419, traded on NASDAQ) file audited annual Form 10-K, quarterly Form 10-Q, and current Form 8-K disclosures under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, subject to PCAOB audit oversight and FASB ASU 2023-08 fair-value crypto accounting rules.

However, shareholders in MARA and RIOT hold unsecured corporate common stock rather than a segregated 1:1 Grantor Trust claim on underlying coins. MARA's custodial and treasury footprint is defined by N/A (Corporate Equity — holds mined & purchased BTC on corporate balance sheet) (indexed in S&P SmallCap 600 / Russell 2000), whereas RIOT's corporate structure is defined by N/A (Corporate Equity) (indexed in Russell 2000). If an operating crypto corporation experiences regulatory enforcement, mining power-cost spikes, exchange fee compression, or convertible debt refinancing stress, its equity price can decouple sharply from spot BTC/ETH NAV.

What Are the US Tax, Wash Sale (IRC § 1091) & Retirement / Estate (IRC § 408 / § 1014) Rules?

For US investors, CPAs, and retirement fiduciaries, holding C-Corporation shares in MARA or RIOT carries distinct tax and retirement characteristics:

Investor Scenario Decision Matrix: Should You Choose MARA or RIOT in 2026?

Investor Persona & Account Type Primary Optimization Goal Recommended Winner Corporate & Statutory Rationale
1. High-Beta Bitcoin Treasury & Leverage Seeker Maximize upside torque during Bitcoin bull cycles MARA Delivers higher historical BTC beta (1.95x) and direct balance-sheet/operating torque with 0.00% ETF management fee.
2. Diversified Crypto Infrastructure & Revenue Allocator Capture trading, custody, stablecoin or fintech cash flows RIOT Provides broader operating revenue diversification (Texas Power Credits + Mining Capacity) beyond pure spot BTC price action.
3. Covered-Call & Cash-Secured Put Options Trader Harvest high implied-volatility weekly & LEAPS option premium MARA + RIOT Both offer deep weekly and LEAPS options chains on NASDAQ / Cboe Options, ideal for tax-sheltered Roth IRA premium harvesting.
4. Restricted 401(k) / Brokerage Account Holder Gain crypto exposure where Spot ETPs are blocked 50/50 Equity Basket Trades as standard C-Corp common stock (S&P SmallCap 600 / Russell 2000) on any US retirement platform with $0 commissions.
5. Pure 1:1 Spot NAV Tracker (Zero Dilution Risk) Eliminate corporate debt, management & share dilution risk IBIT / FBTC / BTC Mini A 1933 Act Grantor Trust ETF (BTC Mini 0.15% or IBIT 0.25%) tracks spot 1:1 without equity dilution.
6. Sovereign 10-Year Cold-Storage Holder ($50k+) Eliminate all corporate, SEC & custodian counterparty risk Direct BTC on Coldcard Q / Trezor Self-custody on Coldcard Q or Trezor Safe 5 carries $0/yr fee and zero corporate insolvency risk.

Frequently Asked Questions (SEC, IRS & Custody Engineering)

How does MARA's crypto business model and Bitcoin exposure differ from RIOT?

MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc. (formerly Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.)) operates in Bitcoin Mining & Digital Energy Infrastructure (Largest publicly traded US Bitcoin mining company by energized hash rate and second-largest corporate Bitcoin treasury holder after Strategy (MSTR).), whereas RIOT (Riot Platforms, Inc.) operates in Bitcoin Mining & Vertically Integrated Data Center Infrastructure (Operates large-scale Bitcoin mining and HPC data center facilities in Rockdale and Corsicana, Texas, plus Kentucky operations (acquired via Block Mining).). Both are C-Corporation equities with 0.00% ETF management fee.

How are MARA and RIOT taxed compared to Spot Bitcoin ETFs?

Unlike 1933 Act Grantor Trust Spot ETFs (which issue Form 1099-B plus a WHFIT statement), MARA and RIOT are C-Corporation common stocks that issue standard Form 1099-B capital gains statements and are subject to the IRC § 1091 30-day Wash Sale Rule.

How does MARA vs RIOT (2026) impact 10-year total cost of ownership on $10,000 and $100,000 allocations?

For MARA vs RIOT (2026), investors must compare compounding percentage-based expense ratios (0.15% to 0.25% per year in US Spot ETFs, which equals $382 per $10,000 or $3,820 per $100,000 over 10 years at 10% CAGR) against one-time hardware self-custody CapEx ($79–$249 with $0/yr ongoing management fee) or flat-fee 2-of-3 multisig retirement vaults.

How do IRS Wash Sale rules (IRC § 1091) and Rev. Proc. 2024-28 apply to MARA vs RIOT (2026)?

SEC-registered Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs (such as IBIT, FBTC, BTC Mini, and ETHA) and public crypto equities (MSTR, COIN) are securities strictly governed by the 30-day IRC § 1091 Wash Sale Rule. Direct spot cryptocurrency held in self-custody is treated as property under IRS Notice 2014-21 and requires wallet-by-wallet cost-basis lot accounting under Rev. Proc. 2024-28.

What custody and counterparty safeguards are verified for MARA vs RIOT (2026)?

Institutional risk management for MARA vs RIOT (2026) requires auditing whether underlying keys sit inside an omnibus NYDFS trust custodian (such as Coinbase Custody Trust, Fidelity Digital Assets, or Gemini Trust) or inside a sovereign EAL6+/dual-chip air-gapped hardware signer (Coldcard Q, Trezor Safe 5, BitBox02) arranged in a multi-vendor 2-of-3 quorum.

FIDUCIARY & COLD-STORAGE DUE DILIGENCE PROTOCOL 0 / 4 VERIFIED (0%)
SEC EDGAR S-1/19B-4 FEE WAIVER, IRC § 408 & DFPI SCAM WIRE INSTANT .TXT PROTOCOL

Receive verified institutional dispatches covering SEC S-1/19b-4 fee amendments, IRS Form 1099-DA / 5498 rulings, and CA DFPI / SEC PAUSE enforcement dockets.